Most clients work with me in more than one shape over the course of our relationship. The engagement starts wherever the problem is most acute — and evolves as the company does. The relationship is the asset; the engagement mode is just how it gets billed.
SHAPE 01 · TRAININGMake your engineers ten times more productive.
Most engineering teams use AI tools the way they used Stack Overflow in 2015 — sporadically and shallowly. I work directly with your team to install the workflows and tooling discipline that turn Claude Code and agentic development into compounding leverage. Often this is the first shape an engagement takes.
HANDS-ON WORKSHOPS ◆ WORKFLOW DESIGN ◆ TOOLING SETUP ◆ 90-DAY FOLLOW-THROUGH
SHAPE 02 · BUILDSBuild your AI infrastructure properly. Once.
Once your team is operating well, the next problem is usually the system itself. I design and build production AI pipelines from the ground up — multi-agent orchestration, RAG, evaluation frameworks, MLOps — with the same discipline I used to ship TraceLayer in three weeks. Built to ship, built to scale, built to maintain after I hand it off.
ARCHITECTURE ◆ IMPLEMENTATION ◆ EVAL FRAMEWORKS ◆ HANDOFF TO YOUR TEAM
SHAPE 03 · EMBEDDEDA senior AI operator inside your team.
When the company is scaling and AI is core to the product, the relationship evolves into embedded leadership. Fractional architect, lead engineer, or technical advisor — inside your Slack, in your standup, owning the AI roadmap. The shape that compounds the most for both sides.
FRACTIONAL ARCHITECT ◆ LEAD ENGINEERING ◆ ADVISORY ◆ ROADMAP OWNERSHIP